Little Pawnee Creek runs through our family’s property.  To the south, it crosses the road at what is affectionately called “The Crooked Bridge.”  The bridge, built in 1910 isn’t crooked, but the approach from each side requires turns and it is a part of a hill as well.  It isn’t easy driving a larger vehicle over it, although I have navigated it with a tractor, older style baler, and wagon all attached.

 

To the west of the bridge is one of the bigger bodies of water along this section of the creek. It is at this location over 50 years ago that my sister, our neighbors, and I had great fun one cool, crisp winter day.

 

Check The Ice

The sun was shining and everyone wanted to get out of the house.  It had been quite cold and the rivers, creeks, and ponds, had frozen over. So, we headed to The Crooked Bridge for a fun adventure. Despite the lengthy cold weather,  Dad checked the ice to make sure it was solid enough to hold everyone’s weight.  I remember him jumping on it and pounding his foot up and down to make sure that there wasn’t any give.  Then, we all carefully stepped off the bank onto the ice.

 

Playing Ball

We all started sliding around. None of us had ice skates and there wasn’t a huge amount of space.  But, there was enough room for sliding, falling, and having  a genuinely good time.  I am not sure how we came to have a rubber ball with us, but we started bouncing it on the ice. We chased it as it bounded down the creek and under the bridge bouncing off the sides.  I remember that when it hit the concrete bridge it would send the ball a different direction and everyone would go sliding after it.

 

Going Bald

By the end of the day, the ball was completely bald, having lost all of its rubber coating.  It had no bounce and would just fall flat.  We may have lost a bouncing ball, but we had so much fun and gained a unique memory that it was totally worth it! 

 

Afterward

 

The featured image is a painting of The Crooked Bridge by Opal Ricketts, who lived nearby.

 

Dewey 1986

I don’t really think of my Uncle Dewey as having a lot of pets.  However, I do remember him as someone who liked animals.  And, someone whom animals liked.  He enjoyed having them around and seemed to be able to do things with them that others couldn’t. According to Dad, Dewey had been that way for as long as he could remember.  Most likely it was Dewey’s calm, quiet demeanor that attracted animals to him.  He may have also learned/inherited some of it from his parents as his mom loved her horse Beauty and his dad was saddened when they had to give up their horses for a tractor.

 

Some stories about Dewey and animals . . .

 

In School

I am not sure how Dewey got a dog to do this, but . . . One day when Dewey was attending Rocky Vale (a one room school house), Dewey snuck a dog into the school.  He got the dog to sit up in one of the student’s desks. Then, he sat a book up in front of the dog like the dog was reading.  How he got the dog to sit there upon his request is a mystery.  However, it was apparently some time before the teacher realized that one of the pupils had four legs and a tail.

 

Around the Farm

Being good with animals is very useful when you raise cows, pigs, and other farm animals.  Some have a mind of their own or are uncomfortable with most humans.  It is helpful if they will cooperate with you.  One story I remember is about some kittens at the barn that hadn’t been tamed.  No one could touch them.  But, Dewey was able to pick them up.

 

Dewey also played with the domesticated animals around the farm.  When he would wait for Dad who was getting a  load of hay, the dogs (and maybe cats) would hang out with him.  He would gently play with them.  Sometimes he would take a blade of grass or whatever he could find nearby and tease them a little with it. 

 

Old Age

As Dewey got older, his skin got thin and he would easily bleed if an animal scratched him.  So, when he would go to visit Dad, whose dogs Dewey loved, Dewey would always take a pair of leather gloves with him.  That allowed him to pet the dogs and enjoy their company without needing to be bandaged up.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

I use DNA almost every day.  I use it to research distant ancestors where research has hit the brick wall, to help people who have been adopted or have other mysteries in their family, and to generally enhance my research.  Yet, I really struggled with what to write about DNA.  I could write about a given case, interesting finds, etc.  Finally, I decided to share an overview of my approach to digging deep into DNA when I am looking for someone several generations back with a brief look at each step using my research to find my great-great-grandfather Lemuel McCracken’s parents. 

 

Define The Questions

I find that it is important to define very specifically what I am trying to find.  And, writing it down is useful to keep the research on track.  It might seem like an unnecessary step, but it is easy to get distracted following many different tangents.

 

Lemuel Case Study: 

The search for the parents of my Great-Great-Grandfather Lemuel McCracken has been going on for decades.  When I started working on finding Lemuel’s parents, all I had were family stories and a handful of records.  Through research I learned many more pieces of information, but I still didn’t know who Lemuel’s parents were or even where he was born.  He had simply shown up around 1850, seemingly alone, as a young man in Lee County, Iowa.  From there, more of the story of his marriages and children have been discovered using traditional genealogy.  That left me with two questions: Who were his parents?  Where was he born?

 

Logic Problem

I approach genealogy brick walls as logic problems.  I write down the facts that I know about the person, what I don’t know, and any reasonable assumptions.  When beginning a case, this is based on traditional genealogy research and family stories.  Thus, I include items, such as, “The family believes . . . ”  I find it important to give ownership to each item since family stories aren’t facts, but can be hints. And, records can be wrong. As I move through the process and learn more, I add (and sometimes remove) statements.

 

Lemuel Case Study: 

I started my DNA search with the following data and assumptions:

    • Records indicate Lemuel was born in 1831.
    • According to records, Lemuel married in Lee County, Iowa in 1854.
    • Records imply Lemuel was in Lee County, Iowa as early as 1850.
    • Records indicate Lemuel was born in either Ohio or Pennsylvania.
    • Family stories indicate Lemuel was a Campbellite (Christian Church).
    • Etc.

 

Testing, Testing, Testing

Depending on the situation, who and where you test may be different. 

Y-DNA

When looking for a male ancestor following an all male line, so doing Y-DNA testing is a logical step. Even when I am looking for both parents, I will follow this step if it applies as learning the father is one part of the question.

 

Lemuel Case Study:

From Lemuel to  my dad is an all-male line.  Thus, Y-DNA testing was an option for determining Lemuel father.   So, both my dad and the son of one of his brothers did Y-DNA tests with FamilyTree.  Each joined the McCracken project as well as other projects related’s to Ireland and Scotland, where the family is believed to have lived prior to the United States.  The projects agreed that my cousin and my dad are of the same family.  But, they did NOT match any other McCrackens.

 

This implies several possibilities:

    • No one in our branch had taken the test. 
    • Perhaps Lemuel’s father was not a McCracken.  Did he make up that name?  Was that his mother’s name?
    • Assuming that his father was a McCracken, it eliminated several major McCracken families from consideration. 

 

Autosomal DNA

Most of my work with DNA relies on autosomal DNA (e.g. Ancestry, 23andme), which provides a lot of flexibility for testing and analysis (e.g. both males and females can test and match any family line). 

 

When trying to find people back several generations, I prefer to test multiple people if possible.  Since DNA inherits unevenly each person will have some different DNA matches.  Additionally, they will match them at different levels, which gives a range for the match to the person, which can be very helpful. When possible I try to have people that descend from multiple of the earliest known person’s descendants. This allows me to narrow down matches more quickly and also increases the possibility of people inheriting different pieces of DNA. However, it is possible to find a distant ancestor using  only matches from one of their children. 

 

For this type of analysis where you are working with known persons, I have found Ancestry to be the most useful, followed by 23andme, MyHeritage, and Gedmatch.  When starting with a known person and looking for their ancestors, shared matches are the best place to  start.   Chromosome browers, what are the odds,  and other tools can be useful for detailed work.

 

 Lemuel Case Study: 

I have access to 24 different people’s DNA tests on Ancestry, 23andme, MyHeritage, FamilyTree, and Gedmatch with the largest number on Ancestry,   Basically, I kept asking anyone of my generation or my dad’s generation to test and asked people who had tested if they would share their DNA results with me.  Those 24 people descend from four of Lemuel’s seven children.

 

The Analysis

  Once I have even one test in hand, I go to work analyzing DNA matches. Some of the techniques that I use include:

  • I make sure each person that tests matches to the family in the expected manner.  If a person matches with DNA that is out of bounds for their relationship, this must be investigated before their DNA can be used in the analysis.
  • I create clusters of people that are related to the specific line of research.  I manually plot relationships as tools for clustering that I have seen to date aren’t designed to work for solving this type of problem where you are looking some distance back and want only certain people, but where relationships may need to be manually analyzed..  Additionally, since I never seem to find simple clusters that are completely independent, I often change how the people are clustered to be able to analyze things differently.
  • Within clusters, I first look to see if I can determine relationships between any of the people in the cluster.  Second, I use the Leeds Method, visual scans, and other techniques to look for a name that connects the people.  Sometimes I add them to my tree and do more research on them to connect them.  If no connection emerges from the group, I re-evaluate the group and look in detail at the connections between different people in the group.  When the groups don’t yield answers, I do special deep dives as if they were the puzzle I am solving.
  • I make lists of names that show up frequently where I haven’t been able to fit them into the puzzle.  Having the lists gives me a reminder that I have seen them before and notes about them can help me connect the dots.
  • I record all descendants of the person in question who have done DNA testing.  I show the direct line back to the person of interest.  This allows me a quick visual of how the descendant DNA matches fit together.
  • I record the groups of people showing the direct line back along the line where they connect (e.g. if I am looking for a Smith connection and they connect to a Smith, I will record that direct line).  Occasionally, I have disconnected groups where I can connect several people back to an earlier ancestor, but where I haven’t yet been able to connect them to any other group.  I do this in a visual chart so that I can see everyone together.  I find this more effective for seeing gaps and possible connections than simply having these people in a tree.
  • When I have a lot of information, I create summary charts to pull pieces of the information together in a compact way to share with others or for additional analysis.
  • When I am not seeing anything new, I do what I call “turning it on its side and upside down.”  What this means is that I revisit information. I review the facts and assumptions, the DNA matches, and other notes. I may even take work that I have done and set it aside and do it again to see if looking at it with a fresh perspective helps.  I will also consider if there is a different angle for analyzing the data.  I also ask myself if there is some additional traditional research or additional genetic genealogy tools that  I can apply.

 

Lemuel Case Study: 

Direct Descendants

I have found  nearly 80 descendants of Lemuel, many that I didn’t know about, through this process. In addition, it led me to 10 descendants of his wife Louisiana and her first husband.  This includes some surprises, such as, a pair of siblings that had no idea that they descend from our family line.

 

McCracken

I determined that Lemuel’s descendants are related to 32 descendants of James McCracken and Rachel Kelly. Additionally, my family matches 35 additional people tied to the McCracken family that I have reasonable evidence to believe descend from the same couple, but where it is not  yet proven. I also have multiple large groups of people who, based on DNA, appear to be related, but whom don’t have enough data to tie them to the McCracken family.  One of these groups is huge with well over 100 people in it.

 

Peppard

In addition, I determined the other primary name associated with Lemuel is Peppard.  Likely McCracken is one parent and Peppard is the other.  I determined that member of our family that tested are related to over 100  identified descendants of Jonathan Peppard and Elizabeth Gilmore. It seems likely that these are Lemuel’s grandparents or great-grandparents.  I have not yet decided which is his paternal family and which is his maternal family. However, I have analyzed all of their children and grandchildren to determine who could possibly be his parents.  The list is very small.

I have also determined that these two families lived very close to each other in Wayne County, Ohio.  Thus, this seems to be the likely place that his parents paths crossed. These pieces of information are now part of the assumptions.

It should also be noted that this information is the result of years of work.  It did not happen overnight.

Complications

Complications typically arise when there connections between families. Generally, the further back the more connects that exist.   For communities with lots of intermarrying (e.g. Quaker, Jewish, certain localities), it can be really complicated.  I have worked some cases where it seemed like everyone was related to everyone else.   The more inter-related families are, the more adjustments that may be needed in thinking about relationships indicated by DNA.

 

Lemuel Case Study:

I have encountered a limited number of connections between families.  In some cases, two people who tested are related two different ways.  In other cases, DNA matches are related to the family line I am researching plus another key family line.  Fortunately, no significant intermarrying has been found on this project.  Thus,   the multiple connections have had a limited impact on my analysis.

 

Additional Reading

 

Note: For any of you that do a quick search on Ancestry or Family Search and see that people show John and Mary McCracken as Lemuel’s parents.  I believe this to be incorrect information.  I have explained to many people the flaw with this theory. 

 

 

Some lives sound just like a movie script or a good book.  You can’t wait to find out what is going to happen next.  Such is the life of Rebecca. . . .

 

Death of Her Mother

Rebecca’s parents welcomed her in May of 1887. She was their first child. During Rebecca’s first year of life, however, her mother became ill.  Over several months, the local women cared for her mother. As Rebecca approached one year of age, her mother grew worse and gave up her fight, leaving tiny Rebecca to fend in the world without a mother to guide her.

 

By the time Rebecca turned three, her father had remarried. A half-brother and half-sister would be born in the years that followed.  Since her dad was a railroad man, was a member of several local organizations, and was involved in local politics, Rebecca spent quite a bit of time with her step-mother, grandfather, aunts & uncles, and others in the community. Some of these were good influences and others were less so.  And, it was known that her half-uncle, who was the apple of her step-grandmother’s eye was spoiled to the core.  No one else measured up in her step-grandmother’s eyes.  With step-siblings and step-aunts/uncles close to her in age, she had plenty of opportunities to be second fiddle.

 

At age six, Rebecca broke her collar bone while playing at school.  A couple of months later she would lose her half-aunt, who was a young teenager, to pneumonia. Other than that, little else remarkable appeared to have occurred during the remainder of her childhood.  However, as Rebecca matured, things began to change.

 

Marriage & Abandonment

On July 11, 1902, Rebecca returned home from visiting Drywood, where her grandfather and step-grandmother lived.  Just over a month later at age 15, Rebecca, with her father’s consent, married Harvey, who was seven years her senior.  Apparently, life together wasn’t a bed of roses. A month after their marriage  Harvey filed charges against Rebecca’s father for disturbing the peace and making threats against him.  Evidently, a month into their marriage Harvey had already abandoned the young bride and her father did not look fondly upon that action.  Her dad pleaded guilty to disturbing the peace and paid a small fine.

 

But, that was just the beginning of the  rocky relationship between the newlyweds.  The following summer Harvey sent Rebecca to Hiattville, a short distance away, to visit.  While she was gone, he proceeded to sell the cow, take all of the money from his paycheck, and skip town without telling anyone where he was going. 

 

With no money and no husband at home, Rebecca went to her father’s house, which was close by.  With their daughter-in-law out of the house, Harvey’s parents took it upon themselves to go to the home she had shared with Harvey and take their furnishings and household goods. 

 

Rebecca’s father saw a light at the house and investigated which led him to their home across the alley from Rebecca and Harvey’s home. There, he found some of the furniture, quilts, etc. that they had taken in Harvey’s parents home.  Other items had immediately been sold.

 

One thing led to another and either her father and/or her step-mother convinced Rebecca to press charges against Harvey’s parents for the theft of the items which they estimated to be valued at $19.50.  Thus, on July 22, 1903, 16-year-old Rebecca filed charges against her mother-in-law and father-in-law.

 

Dividing The Town

Now, being 16, being abandoned by your husband, and being in the middle of your parents and your in-laws might seem like a lot to handle.  However, when your father-in-law is the town marshall, your father a city councilman, and they are of opposite politics it gets a lot more complicated.  This is especially true when your father-in-law has made lots of enemies by strongly enforcing temperance rules while his sons are known to partake of the Devil’s drink.  And, rumor has it that they bootleg it, too.

 

Before long, the entire tiny town of Hepler had taken sides.  No one, it seemed, was neutral. 

 

On Trial

That August the trial took place a few miles away in the county seat.  There was no question that Harvey’s parents had taken the furnishings.  However, they contended that Rebecca said that they could take the furnishing and sell whatever they wanted. It was a sixteen-year-old’s word against that of the town marshall and his wife, as no one had witnessed any conversations between them.

 

Additionally, her in-laws argued that they had helped the young couple set up housekeeping so they were entitled to the belongings.  But, they still planned, according to their testimony, to send the money to Harvey as soon as they knew where he was.

 

Rebecca’s family argued that wasn’t the case.  It got more personal with arguments about Rebecca’s father forcing Harvey to marry her.  It wasn’t like their son wasn’t an adult when the marriage took place.  And, all reports were that it was a consensual arrangement.  However, Harvey  did work for Rebecca’s father which may have played a part in the argument.

 

 In the end, the jury was split on who to believe. And, the trial ended in a hung jury – twice!  After the second trial, the judge chose to dismiss the case.

 

The Preacher & His Wife

In January 1904, Rebecca was looking for work in Ft. Scott. A minister and his wife took her in and gave her a job helping the minster’s wife.  She claimed that her husband had secured work at a restaurant on the east side of town.  Now, whether Rebecca and Harvey were both in town and had come together is unclear.  However, it is clear that she was a couple of months pregnant at the time.

 

The arrangement with the preacher and his wife did not last long.  The exact circumstances are murky, but it had something to do with moral behavior.   The preacher’s wife soon asked Rebecca to leave and told her to return to Hepler.  Rebecca refused.  The police became involved in the situation. Initially, they started to look for a home for Rebecca.  However, soon Rebecca was given the choice of leaving town or going to jail.  Rebecca left town, apparently alone.

 

The Baby

By the time her baby was born in August, Rebecca was in Kansas City, Missouri.  She named the little girl Dorothy.  However, Rebecca was unable to care for her child.  Thus, she left Dorothy with the Evangelical Lutheran Kindergarten Society.  According to Rebecca, the agreement was that they would take care of Dorothy until Rebecca was able to do so.

 

Meanwhile, Harvey had lived in Ft. Scott and then returned to Iowa where he had gone when he skipped town.  It was there that on their third anniversary he finally filed for divorce.  He stated that Rebecca was the one who had abandoned him.

 

The Lawsuit

After Dorothy was born, Rebecca worked as a domestic and possibly in other jobs. Then, in June of 1907, Dorothy married Joseph.  The following January she returned to the Evangelical Lutheran Kindergarten Society to get Dorothy, who was now three years old.  They told her that Dorothy had been adopted and refused to give her the name of the adopting couple or the location of her daughter. Furious, Rebecca hired an attorney and stated that she intended to sue for the information. 

 

Flash forward to  April of 1910, the census listed Dorothy and two other children living with Rebecca and Joseph.  This seems more of a fantasy than a reality as the census also indicates all three are her children, but Rebecca and Joseph had no children.  However, Joseph had adopted two children in hopes of satisfying Rebecca. She openly pined for both Dorothy and Harvey from early in the marriage.  She made  no secret of the fact she still loved Harvey and felt no love for Joseph. However, adopting the children had not worked out well. And, by the time of the census, Joseph had returned the children.  Additionally,  other records indicate Dorothy was with her adoptive family at the time. 

 

The Suicide Attempt

On April 28 of that year, only a couple weeks after the census, Rebecca and Joseph separated.  Rebecca returned to Harvey, whose wife had recently died, to proclaim her love for him.  Apparently, he did not return her affection. 

 

So, around 4 a.m. Sunday June 5, 1910 Rebecca went to Harvey’s father’s house where in an attempt to poison herself, she ingested two ounces of laudanum.  Harvey’s father found her on the porch unconscious and moaning, while clutching Harvey’s photograph.  He immediately called for a doctor and Rebecca’s life was spared.

 

In September, Joseph filed for divorce.

 

Another Husband

In March 1912, Rebecca married again.  This time to Charles, who like her other husbands was several years older than her.  They married in the Kansas City area, lived for a time in Topeka, and finally settled in Abilene.

 

In February 1916, she took $2 of his pay, sold the chickens and took off for Topeka with $20 in hand.  Her husband, reportedly, was puzzled and surprised at her disappearance.  She proceeded to file for divorce stating that he treated her cruelly and neglected her.

 

The divorce must have never been finalized as Charles filed for divorce for abandonment of more than one year on November 18, 1920.  It was granted January 25, 1921.  In 1920, at least for a time, Rebecca was livingin Cheyenne, Wyoming and working as a waitress.  She reported at the time that she was divorced. 

 

I wondered why she might have been in Wyoming.  We will likely never know, but it seems possible that she was trying to make her way to Washington to where Dorothy lived.  Dorothy’s adoptive parents had died before she reached the age of maturity.  When some of their grown children had moved west, Dorothy had moved west with them.

 

Back to Harvey

March 1, 1921, Rebecca finally remarried Harvey in Des Moines, Iowa, but she did so using her middle name. Both claimed it was their second marriage. However, it was at least Rebecca’s  fourth and Harvey’s third. 

 

Her Death

 

February 24, 1923, Rebecca took her last breath.  She had undergone an operation at a hospital in Kansas City.  Harvey, along with her father,  accompanied her body to its final resting place at Hiattville, but it appears that they were once again divorced.  He was living in Iowa; she in Kansas City.  And, her death certificate stated that she was divorced.  Yet, Harvey and Dorothy were both acknowledged as her survivors in her obituary.

 

Rebecca’s official cause of death was listed as status lymphaticus.  But, in reality she died a broken woman with a heart that had been broken far too long.  Rebecca was only 35.

 

Afterward

 

Although this story is about Rebecca and her troubled life, it seems Harvey  possibly played a bigger role in keeping Rebecca infatuated with him than is documented.  It just appears that their paths kept crossing and if Dorothy is in fact his child, that would imply that he came back to her in the fall of 1903 around the time of one of the trials.  Additionally, some years after Rebecca died, Harvey was sued by another man for having an ongoing relationship with his wife, including taking her on a vacation and finally stealing her away.

 

Image: pixabay.com  Free to use under the Content License .

 

 

When I go to cemeteries, which I do more than most people, I generally notice two types of graves in particular – the graves of soldiers and single gravestones that are surrounded by seemingly unused plots.  The latter break my heart because I know that in many cases the person died and the family bought plots, but then decided later to move on.  These single graves are particularly heart-wrenching when they are the graves of children.  Sometimes I wonder if descendants of the family know about these people, especially those that died very young.

 

Until recently, I hadn’t thought about single graves of members of my own family.  Most of the cemeteries for my family have at least several members of the family buried in them.  And, in a several cases, many people in the cemetery are related to me.  Yet, there are family members that are the only one of the family to be buried in a cemetery. 

 

Below are the stories of how a few members of my family came to lie alone without other family.

 

Grant Ashby

One of the first people that came to mind when I thought of people that weren’t buried with the rest of the family was my great-great grandfather Grant Ashby.  We spent quite a bit of time one day looking for his grave near Holly, Colorado.   The tiny cemetery was several miles away from town and was completely barren except for a few gravestones.   Not a single tree stood to shade in the small isolated cemetery.

 

Grant had been born in Indiana, married in Iowa, and then settled for a bit in Bourbon County, Kansas.  In 1910, he had sold out and moved to this desolate location. I don’t know why the family left eastern Kansas, where he had grown corn stalks 14 feet tall for this lonesome place. He was able to homestead 1280 acres. However, in order to meet the requirements for homesteading, Grant and his sons had to take long trips to the foot of the Rockies for wood for fence posts.  Additionally, they had to till considerable land for crops.  But, these weren’t the only challenges for the family.  Until they dug a well, they had to haul water 25 miles from Holly.  And, their closest neighbor lived five miles away with the closest doctor residing in Holly. They were pretty much on their own in the middle of nowhere.

 

A mere five years after they arrived in Colorado, Grant died of a stroke.  With difficult living conditions and the family’s main provider gone, it wasn’t long before the family pulled up roots and moved to California. 

Louisiana Mateer Badgley McCracken

Louisiana (my great-great grandmother) was living with Lemuel and their kids in Crawford County, Kansas when she became ill.  The story, according to Dad, is that they were headed to family when she died.  For many years we believed that she was probably buried along a trail somewhere.  Dad thought that he heard they were headed to Peoria, Illinois.  However, no tie to Peoria has been found.  Since Louisiana’s oldest daughter with her first husband James Badgley lived near Quincy, Illinois, it is possible that is where they were headed.

 

In any case, several years ago, I discovered that she was buried at Morris Cemetery in Bates County, Missouri, northeast of where they had lived.  Perhaps they had some family at this place that had helped care for Louisiana or perhaps she died in route to their final destination.  In either case, she ended up being buried in this small, secluded cemetery that sits at the end of a road  across from the only house on the road.  No other family members are known to have been buried there.

 

After Louisiana’s death, Lemuel remained in Bates County.  In 1881, three months shy of two years after Louisiana’s death, Lemuel remarried to Melissa Eviline Donley. Lemuel and Eviline stayed in the area for about ten years before moving to Chautauqua County, Kansas.  

 

Lemuel McCracken

As Lemuel (my great-great grandfather) and this third wife Melissa (Eviline) Donley aged, they eventually moved back to Crawford County, settling with or near Lemuel’s son Andrew.  About a month before Lemuel died, he was sent to the state hospital in Osawatomie, as he had become difficult to handle.  I don’t know exactly what that meant.  It could be that he had dementia, Parkinsons, or a host of other issues.  Unfortunately, the probate court could not find any records associated with his case.

 

When Lemuel died, he was buried at the cemetery at the institution. Not only is he buried without family,  the gravestones in this cemetery  look so mundane.  Just row after row of ugly, plain gravestones.  They don’t even have names on them, only numbers.  So sad. And, it is the eeriest cemetery I have ever encountered.

 

Eviline was buried in Texas near one of her children.

 

John Van Allen

My husband’s great-great grandfather John Van Allen died at Vicksburg while serving in the Civil War.  He was with Company B, Wisconsin 33rd Infantry Regiment when he became ill.  He is buried at Vicksburg National Military Park, hundreds of miles from Wisconsin, where his family lived.

 

Bonus Story:  Arden Johansen

Arden was not related to our families.  He was a friend of my Uncle Dewey.  He died a month before his 16th birthday. After his family left the area, the McCracken family adopted him in a way.  They always make sure he has flowers on his grave when they put flowers on the graves of family members.  This task has passed from Dewey and his wife to Mom and Dad to our generation.