This article explores the current status of research for the three family lines that I most actively researched in  2025 and a look back at the articles I wrote during the year.

 

The Family Tree Evolves

Currently, my tree on Ancestry contains 45,344 people and my off-line, official tree contains 42,547 people.  That is an increase of 833 on ancestry.com and an increase of 64 in my official tree.  The reason for the discrepancy is that I am adding people to the McCracken and Peppard lines that I know are related.  However, I haven’t added them to my official tree as the exact connection (e.g. Lemuel’s parents) is not known.

Rod’s family trees are much smaller mostly due to the fact that his family immigrated to the United States much later than most of my family.  His trees contain 3,744 people and 5,263 people on Ancestry and in our official database, respectively.  That is an increase of 54 on ancestry.com and 43 in the official tree.

People in both trees are proven in to varying degrees.  In recent years, I have gone back and double-checked people in my direct line and noted in my official tree if they are verified.  So, for instance, information seems to point to Lucy Ann Storms’ father being Conrad Storms and we are definitely related to many Sturm/Storm/Storm(s)(es).  However, no record has been found that I can use to confirm that relationship.  Thus, in the official tree, Lucy Ann is marked verified and Conrad is included in the tree, but is not marked verified.  This capability now exists in ancestry.com.  However, I have used it only on a limited basis, mostly to identify someone who is definitely in question.

 

Projects

Although I am always working toward generally growing and improving the family tree, I usually have at least one special project in the works for our families.  Those are projects that typically involve using DNA, doing local research, and traditional research online, to try to find information on a person who has been difficult to track down.

Three special projects are currently most active.  Let’s take a look.

 

Lemuel McCracken

Lemuel McCracken’s Parents

Nothing has been found to disprove or alter the assumptions about Lemuel’s parents.  Y-DNA showed that his father was a Peppard.  Thus, his mother is a McCracken.  I still believe that his mother was most likely a daughter or granddaughter of James and Rachel (Kelly) McCracken.  Likewise, I still believe that his father was likely one of Jonathan and Elizabeth (Gilmore) Peppard’s sons.  

These families lived close to each other in Wayne County, Ohio in the early 1800s.

 

DNA Research

Matches Identified

Below is an update on the number of McCracken and Peppard DNA matches that have been identified as fitting into each of the categories listed.

 

DNA Matches that are  Begin 2025 End 2025 Comment
Descendants of Lemuel and his first wife 23 30  
Descendants of Lemuel and Louisiana 62 67 Includes those that tested for me
Descendants of Louisiana and her first husband 11 13  
Total 96 110  
       
Descendants of James and Rachel (Kelly) McCracken 83 131 Includes some  branches that have strong evidence that they belong to this family, but have not been 100% proven.
Descendants of Jonathan and Elizabeth (Gilmore) Peppard 121 188  
Bonus Peppard matches through the Bailey family 18 26 This family did not believe they had any ties to the Peppard family.  However, both autosomal DNA and Y-DNA say that they do.

 

DNA Analysis

In addition to looking at new DNA matches as seeing how they align with the families involved, I also spent quite a bit of time looking at the strongest matches to see if any pattern appeared.  I started by looking at the older generation.  I have 4 samples for that generation.

 
McCracken

Among my samples. there are only 4 matches to descendants of James and Rachel (Kelly) McCracken at over 100 centimorgans.  Two of these are descendants of Nathaniel McCracken, and two are descendants of Thomas McCracken.  Nathaniel had one daughter who would have been old enough to be Lemuel’s mother.  It is important to note that Nathaniel’s descendants may be doubly connected to us.  This isn’t clear.  However, DNA matches to both us and Nathaniel’s descendants seem to match in a different way.  

Thomas’ family has been more difficult to connect as Thomas died young and his wife died only a few years later.  However, I have DNA matches that appear to possibly be descendants of his daughters.  Unfortunately, he only mentioned his two young sons in his will.  Thus, I haven’t been able to prove the relationship. 

When I look at total number of DNA matches in the range I am considering (>30 centimorgans), Thomas and Nathaniel show up with the largest numbers.  That is not, however, meaningful since it relies on the number of descendants that have tested.  

 

Peppard

Among the same samples, there are only two matches to descendants of Jonathan and Elizabeth (Gilmore) Peppard.  They both descend from his son John.  When looking at total number of DNA matches, John also leads his siblings. In addition, it seems most likely based primarily on circumstances that the Bailey matches are descendants of John.  This would increase the number of DNA matches to John significantly.

Rebecca also has a number of descendants.  However,  being female, she is out of contention as a parent.  She has no known children old enough to be Lemuel’s father.  It is,, however, possible that she had a child when she was young who would be old enough to be Lemuel’s father.  Still, it seems more likely that Rebecca’s descendants have a double connection that increase the strength of the match.

I have now expanded this analysis to include  people in my generation as part of the sample.  I am now working with a much larger data set and it will take some time to see if patterns emerge.  In addition, I am also looking  for connections to various women.  For instance, if one of Thomas McCracken’s assumed daughters is Lemuel’s mother, descendants of his wife’s family should show up in DNA matches.  Unfortunately, it is a common name and we have multiple possible connections to that name.

 

Read about Lemuel and Louisiana: A Journey of Discoveries.

Read research notes.  Follow the links on the pages to different pieces of data regarding this research. Not all research has been added to this series of webpages. 

 

Arthur Reid Thomson’s Parents

According to Arthur Reid Thomson, he was an orphan.  He had lived with his grandfather in Scotland before making his way across the ocean.  It is unknown if his grandfather was his mother’s father or his father’s father.

He was supposedly sent to live with an uncle in New York, but went to Canada with “friends” instead.  He later came to the United States.  It is believed his father was also named Arthur and that he had a brother Alexander and sister, Gennia, who remained in Scotland.  Supposedly, he lost contact with his family for many years, but did make contact later in life. 

Read about Arthur’s Long Road to a Homestead.

 

DNA Research

Y-DNA

Rod did a Y-DNA test.  The results included four men – all with different last names.  One of the men did have the name “Thompson.”  That could be a variation of Thomson or it could be a totally unrelated surname.  I am currently searching ancestry data (autosomal DNA) for the surnames.  I have found a good-sized group that have ties to Scotland and North Ireland.  However, they are very distantly related to Rod’s branch and most are distantly related to each other.  Only a very small number show the name Thomson in their tree.  However, it isn’t clear that Rod connects to them on that specific branch.

In Addition, I have found a group with strong Canada ties.  However, it isn’t clear how they are related to Rod.  I found a couple of pieces of data that indicate they might be distant relatives in the Van Allen family line, but there is more work to do.

 

Autosomal DNA

We have not been able to identify any matches that are definitely Thomson matches beyond direct descendants of Arthur.  It would seem that if his uncle was in New York, that matches to some descendants would be found.  However, it is possible that the uncle was a maternal uncle.  

We recently tested three additional members of the family – two in Rod’s generation and one in his dad’s generation.  Since everyone in a family inherits different pieces of DNA, we are hoping that the additional testing will result in new matches that help determine the names of Arthur Reid Thomson’s parents.

Roger Ellis’ Parents

This year I started systematically researching Roger Ellis’ parents.  He is my 4th great-grandfather and our earliest known Ellis ancestor.  There are theories about his parents, but it doesn’t appear that any of them are based on anything other than other Ellis families in the general area.  It may, or may not, be important that this family often spelled their name Elless or Elles.  Additionally, the family Bible spells the name of the original owner as David Alles.  Although, the entries apparently are with the name Elless.  

 

Read research notes.  Follow the links on the pages to different pieces of data regarding this research.  Not all research has been added to this series of webpages. 

 

 

DNA Research

DNA Matches that are  Begin 2025 End 2025 Comment
Descendants of Roger Ellis and his wife Susannah Lewis   176 Includes people that tested for me.

 

All the DNA matches that I have been able to definitively tie to our Ellis family line are descendants of Roger and Susannah (Lewis) Ellis.  I do have a couple of groups of interest that I have identified. 

One group contains descendants of Enos Ellis, who was born in 1786, which would make him a contemporary of Roger.  However, the name Enos Ellis does not appear in the family Bible, which lists Roger and what appear to likely be some or all of his siblings. The name Ellis is super common and it is possible that this group connects to us in a different way.

The second group is clearly associated with the Ellis family or one of the allied families.  People cluster under several different names and some of the clusters are in West Virginia.  Since George Nicholson, another ancestor, was from West Virginia, it is possible that this group ties into his family line instead of the Ellis family.  However, I am in the middle researching them, so I have no definitive answer yet.  If they are related to George Nicholson instead of Roger Ellis that could help solve the mystery of George’s parents.  Some people have identified who they believe are George’s parents.  However, I have not found enough evidence to date to add those people as his parents.

 

2025 Articles

This year I didn’t keep up with an article each week.  However, some of the articles were quite in-depth.  They required extensive research.  I have one that I started about my 3rd great-grandfather Henry Thomas in the Seminole Indian Wars.  It was one of those that required a lot of research.  I hope to finish it in 2026.

Below are the articles I wrote this year.

 

Anderson (Van Allen)

The Wall Tumbles Down

 

Ashby

A War Years Letter

 

Brooks (Klinefelter)

Life at the Home for Aged Protestant Women

 

Ellis

Buried in the cemetery or not?

Joe Ellis: Frontiersman

South Dakota’s Grand Old Man of Aviation

 

Hanson (Van Allen)

Accidents, Deaths, and Other Challenges

 

Hurrie

Near Kin

 

Matteer

The Search For Louisiana

 

McCracken

An Amazing Lady!

Four Brothers and One War

In My Dreams

Shhhh! Don’t Tell

Suddenly Getting Older

The Artistic Obituary

The Last Letter

The Old Sawmill

When You Open A Can of Worms

 

McGinley (Klinefelter)

Astonished!

 

Peelle

Did a Family Name Start as a Nickname?

It Started With A Pulley

The Mystery Music Man

 

Pellett

A Pellett Journey

Chicken And Noodles

Sleigh Accident

The Children’s Librarian

What A Name!

 

Peppard

The 1762 Princeton Graduate

 

Stackhouse (Klinefelter)

I Take Thee . . .

The Deadly Voyage

 

Thomas

Grandma’s Rocker

 

Thomson

The Freedom Train

 

Multiple

All Roads Lead to Bourbon County

A Thousand Memories

DNA Ethnicity Meets Traditional Genealogy

Fire After Fire

Hiattville: A Rural Town

My Ancestral Religious History

The Beginning of 2025

The Signature

 

 

2026 Research

It is very likely that George Nicholson’s parents will end up getting worked with the Ellis research since possible DNA matches to that line are popping up when looking at distant Ellis matches.

 

Future Projects

Future projects under consideration:

  • Was Elizabeth Brown Donaldson really kin to Chief Justice John Marshall?  I have worked on this one quite a bit with traditional research.  Additionally, I contributed to a project looking at this with DNA.  Read about the John Marshall research.
  • Was Tabitha Dunigan really a daughter of President John Adams who was born out of wedlock?  To date, I have not found anything that proves or disproves her parentage.  Read Creative Genealogy – The Story of John Adams and our Family.
  • Am I related to women who were persecuted during the Salem Witch Trials?  It is thought that my Thomas family might be related, but that we are not a direct descendant.  At least one other family needs to be researched as they had ties to the area.
  • Who were George Nicholson’s parents?
  • Who were Martha (Johnson) Peelle’s 5 missing siblings and what happened to them?  I have worked on this question on and off, but have never undertaken a special project to find them.
  • The German ancestry of Helm, Kutzner, Schmidt, Ackermann, Stetler etc.
  • Identifying descendants of William Hurrie, who rang the Liberty Bell.
  • A woman who was buried at the same cemetery as William Hurrie’s granddaughter claimed to be related to William Hurrie.  Basic research shows she was German and he was said to be from Scotland.  Not sure if she was related to his granddaughter’s husband, William’s wife or if there was really no connection despite her claim.
  • Is Matthias Matteer’s ancestors who they appear to be?
  • Who was Mary Rogers/Rodgers’ parents?

 

 

Featured Image: Source: Pixabay.com

AI Generated

Family Tree Family Life Cycle royalty-free stock illustration. Free for use & download.

Prompt: Memorable

#52ancestors52weeks

Who is this young man and what is the musical instrument that he is holding?

 

The Photo

The original photo is a tin type photo of a young man holding a wind instrument.  The photo is 2.5 inches by 4 inches and is not in a paper sleeve.  It was referred to as a “large gem” and considered a slightly upscale version of the tiny gems, which were really tiny.  The size alone dates the photo to 1870 or later.  These specific types of photos were most popular from 1872 to 1874.

I am hoping knowing the possible date range of the photo will help identify the young man in the photo.  He appears to be in his late teens or twenties.  Based on his minimal facial hair, grok estimated his age as 17-22 as during the 1870s most men wore some amount of facial hair.

Let’s see what else we can learn from this photo.

 

Family & Location

Dad had a number of tin type photos.  Several of them are unidentified.  However, they appear to have been with other photos of the Peelle family.  In addition, the young man’s hair line is similar to that of a number of the men in the Peelle family. Thus, it seems likely that this photo is of someone related to the Peelle family.  Given that, it is likely that the photo was taken in Indiana, possibly in Randolph or Wayne counties.

It is important to note that this type of photo was known to be taken in Richmond, Indiana, which is in Wayne County.  It is also known that the Peelle family had family in Richmond.  Another location where these types of photos were taken is Indianapolis.  The family had ties in Indianapolis, too.  However, it was further from where most of the family lived.

 

Photo Progression

The following shows a progression from the tin type to a black and white photo with more detail and finally with a colorized photo.  By doing the black and white and colorized versions many new details of the photo can be seen.

Original Tin Type

 

Photo after cropping and being converted to black and white

 

Photo colorized and enhanced by Google Gemini AI

 

The Clothing

Grok referred to his jacket as a “sack jacket.”  It was clothing typically worn by workers and indicates he was lower-middle-class or below.  It is consistent with the time period of the photo type.  His jacket, shirt, necktie, hair style, and even his pose are all consistent with the photo being taken in the 1870s.

A possible braid showing on the cuffs may indicate that he was a part of a firemen’s brass band or a town band.  Although I can’t see enough detail to know, grok believes that it is the same pattern that various firemen’s bands had in several states, including Indiana.  It is believed to show great similarity to surviving uniforms from Richmond during this era.

The Instrument

The instrument is an over-the-shoulder E♭ alto saxhorn.  The design indicates it is a later version near the time that they started changing the design of the horn.  This style was popular up until around 1880, although some were used after that date.  This model was made by Isaac Fiske’s company and sold in Indianapolis.

It appears that the young man was a member of some type of band.  It could have been a town band or a firemen’s band.

It was popular for members of bands to have photos taken with their instruments.  Often they were in their uniform, but not always.  The photo could have been taken in a studio, but it might also have been taken at the county fair or other special event by a traveling photographer.  This specific style instrument is common in photos from 1872 to 1877.

 

Studio Setting

The backdrop was very common in the 1870s.  In addition, the stool complete with fringe was a popular prop of that era.  The combination of a fringed stool and a similar/same background image is found in surviving examples, including from traveling photographers in various states, including Indiana.  In addition, this specific background has been found in at least eight tintypes from Indiana.  Those photographs were taken between 1873 and 1877 with one of the confirmed photographs having been taken in Indianapolis.

 

Image after colorization and age progression to age 60 via Gemini.

Profile

If we use 1873-1877 as suggested by grok for the date range for this photograph and the likely age given of 17 -22, it implies that this man was born between 1851 and 1860.  I like to expand a bit on the suggested year ranges given people in more rural areas didn’t wear the latest styles or might not have had the “in” instruments. Likewise, he might be a bit younger or older than he appears.  Thus, I think this man likely was born between 1847 and 1865. 

One of his parents was likely a Peelle, although it is possible that the tie to the family was at his grandparent’s generation.  It seems most likely that he lived in Indiana and possibly in or near Richmond.

The image shows an age progression of the man to approximately age 60.  I included it so that it could be used if photographs of the man when he is older are found.

 

Further Research

If I do not identify this young man, further research can be done at the Indiana State Library and the Indiana Historical Society.  Both institutions have collections of tintypes, including those of bands.  This might help identify the location or exact date of the photo.  If I get really lucky.  I might be able to identify the man through their collections.

 

 

 

 

AI apps:  grok, Gemini

Prompt: Musical

#52ancestors52weeks

My Grandma Dessie May (Thomas) Pellett’s rocking chair is likely my oldest piece of furniture.  If the conclusion by grok (AI) is accurate, it is “a classic Victorian-era Eastlake-style spindle rocker” made by New York Wire and Spring Company in 1888.

 

Memories

Always There

Grandma had an old wooden rocking chair.  It seems like she always had that chair and I definitely don’t remember it suddenly arriving in her home.  That said, I don’t know when she got the chair.  It is possible that it was her mother’s rocker or that it belonged to her husband Clifford Claney Pellett’s family.  Other possibilities are that she bought it at a sale or it was given to her by a neighbor or family member. 

If I had realized the age of the rocker, I would have asked about its history.  As it was, it just seemed like and old rocking chair and I liked sitting in it when I visited.

 

How did it survive

Most rockers of this age haven’t survived and it is amazing that this one did.  For a time, it was painted blue-green.  Afterwards, it was refinished, but not by an expert.  Traces of paint are still visible, especially in the less obvious locations.  Probably around the time it was refinished, a new seat was put in. 

In addition, the  rocker wasn’t always in the house.  For a period of the time it sat on my grandma’s back porch.  Kansas weather, even when sheltered by a roof, is really hard on wood furniture.  However, it survived it all.

 

Elma Lorene (Pellett) McCracken holding her first grandchild in Grandma’s rocker

My Rocker

My grandmother gave her old rocker to me many years ago.  I used it when each of my sons were born and it has traveled with me from house to house.  In our move to Kansas City, I was heart-broken when one of the rockers broke.  Based on where and how it broke, I didn’t think there was any way that it could be fixed without the “fix” being obvious.  However, the moving company hired an amazing company that restores antique wood items.  They fixed the rocker and most people would ever know.  Today, it has the perfect spot in our home.  And, no, I have never sat it outside.

 

Identifying The Rocker

Since I was going to write about the rocker, I thought I would try to learn more about it.  I didn’t know if anything could be learned about it, but I thought it was worth a try.  So, I started exploring using three different AI tools: Chatgpt, Gemini, and grok.  I provided photos and asked questions.  For this specific task, grok seemed to dig into the details the quickest.  Thus, the results shown below are based primarily on its responses.

 

Initial Assessment.

It was initially determined to be “a classic Victorian-era Eastlake-style spindle rocker” and a wide range of years was given.  However, various characteristics of the rocking chair helped narrow down the date of production to 1888.  In some instances, a series of questions and/or photos were used to ensure we had the right time period.

 

The Maker

In general, the design of rockers changed over time and a general timeline could be created based on those attributes.  However, the most critical attribute to determine a specific year of the rocker was identifying the company that made it. 

Grok gave guidance on locations where a maker’s mark might have been place.  One location was on the underneath of the seat.  This is where  a one-inch high “N” was found.  This was the mark of the New York Wire and Spring Company.  They had used “NYW&S” and a single “N.”  However, they soon opted for a smaller “NYW&S” as their maker’s mark.  This change in their makers mark helped narrow down the years that it might have been manufactured.

 

Heart design

The heart design on the back of the chair is actually quite elaborate with floral type swirls in addition to the heart.  Many manufacturers made heart designs.  NYW&S made multiple designs with hearts.  One had a single heart and another had a heart with simple geometric patterns.

 

Wood

Rocking chairs of this general type were often made of oak or maple.  The wood grain helped determine that the chair was made of quarter-sawn white oak.  Not all of NYW & S rockers were made of this specific wood.  Many were made of a mix of oaks.  Again, this factored into determining the specific year and model of the chair.

The grain of the wood was critical in determining that it isn’t a cheap copy.  Imitations typically use pine, which appears completely different.

 

Rush Notches

The original seat is long gone.  It has been replaced by a padded seat covered in fabric.  However, the under side of the seat provides enough information to determine the type of seat that the rocking chair originally had.

On the underside of the rocker next to the hole that contained the original seat are two notches.  Those indicate that it originally had a “rush seat.”  This type of seat was made from “dried stems of the Junucus effusus plant.”  They were woven in a “seven-strand envelope weave.”  It would have been in a clockwise spiral with no knots visible on the upper side, creating a herringbone pattern with distinctive diagonal ridges.

 

Shape of the rocker

One very important attributes is dating the rocking chair was the shape of the rockers under the chair.  The rockers turn upward at each end.  They are described as having ski-tips.

 

Attributes of the arm posts

The arm posts of NYW&S’ rocking chairs varied.  Some were plain, some bulbous, and others “acorn” shaped.  Grok felt that this chair fell into the latter category.  This was also critical in determining the age of the rocker.

 

Spindles on back

The shape of the spindles that create the back of the chair helps determine the date and model of the chair.  However, the number of spindles are also very important because NYW&S Co. only made rocking chairs with seven spindles of this type in 1888 and 1889.

 

Determining the Year and Model

When the time period of all the attributes were considered, 1888 was the only year that the NYW&S Co. made a style of rocking chair that included all of the attributes of Grandma’s rocker:

  • Ski tip rockers
  • Seven spindles
  • A heart design with floral swirls
  • Acorn supports
  • Rush notches (Rush seat)
  • “N” makers mark
  • White oak 

 

Fortunately, a catalog from 1888 survived.  From the catalog, grok learned that was a Model 88-H (Fancy/No. 1) that sold for $7.  It was an expensive rocking chair costing  $1.50 more than the most expensive option from 1887 and 75¢ more than the 1889 option.

 

My Thoughts

I treasured the rocker before I researched it and I am glad to know more about its history.  Based on the fact the rocker was considered a high-end model and cost more than others at that time, I think it is most likely that Grandma bought it used.  I just don’t see either family spending any significant amount of money on a rocking chair.

If it had the original finish, was fully restored, and was in perfect condition (which it isn’t), grok claims it could be valued as high as $2900.  As is, it is not monetarily valuable.  Instead, it is what it has always been, a chair that I like to sit in.

 

What does a signature have to say about you?   I started saving signatures of relatives several years ago.  This article explores the signatures of some direct ancestors of my husband and myself.

 

Just Initials

In bygone days, it was common for men’s signatures to  include only the initials of their given names and their surname.  Many documents and news articles were written also without the man’s first name, which can make researching families with similar initials difficult.

Both of the following  men used their initials at times.  Occasionally, Andrew is found with is name as Andy.  The way he wrote McCracken is sometimes misunderstood by transcribers.  Thus, the name sometimes becomes Cracken in indexes.

William was known as William, W J, and Will.  His signature is also interesting because it contains both cursive and fancy print.

Andrew Johnson “Andy” McCracken

William Johnson Peelle

The following signatures of women show how they often defined themselves by their marriage or lack there of.  Both Blanche and Donna signed with their husband’s name while Minnie indicated that she was not married.

 

Blanche (Klinefelter) Thomson

 

 

Donna (Van Allen) Thomson

 

 

Minnie (Kutzner) Helm

Not all women identified their marital status in their signature.  Interestingly, however, in the examples below, Matilda signed with her maiden name as a middle name.

Nellie signed with the name she was always called.  However, it wasn’t her birth name.  Her name at birth was Eleanor.  It was the name of her great-grandmother and her great-aunt.  Both of those women had been major influences in her mother’s life and she likely wanted to honor them.  However, Nellie did not like the name Eleanor.  And, since she was called Nellie when she was young, the name stuck.  To my knowledge no documentation exists that uses her birth name.

Martha was born in 1826 and I believe she signed the source document after 1900.  

Matilda (Jury) Peelle

 

Nellie (Peelle) McCracken

Martha (Johnson) Peelle

 

The following signatures show three different styles of signature.  One with a first name only, one with a first name and middle initial, and one with the full name.  Those with a full name are typically found on draft registrations, although not all draft registrations are signed with the full name.  

Passco Peelle

 

 

Willis Alexander Conner

 

 

Clifford Claney Pellett

 

The following are additional signatures where the men signed their full name on draft registrations.  It is likely that this was not their standard signature. 

Alexander Joseph Thomson

James William “Will” Thomas

Herbert James Thomson

 

The following examples show how different a given person’s signatures can be.  In both cases, the first signature had an abbreviated form of their the first name.  The second signature is a full signature with all three names.

The odd thing in the case of Jake Helm is that when he signed his full name, he still used Jake instead of Jacob.  In addition, he wrote his name as “Jake Phillip Helm.”  However, his name as recorded on his baptism record was “Phillip Jacob Helm.” 

It was tradition in Germany, the Helm family’s homeland, to call people by their middle name.  In many cases, the boys all had the same first name and all the girls had the same first name.  Each being named after their father or mother according to gender.  This family did not go so far as to name all the children that way.  However, they did have multiple sons named Johann.  And, Jake couldn’t be Phillip because he had an older brother Johann Phillip, who later went by Phillip John.  And, yes, German traditions are confusing, but they are much more so when intermixed with American traditions.

With regards to Joe McCracken, he generally signed his name as “Joe McCracken.”  Thus, signing with the full name would not have been natural for him.  That is likely the case for most people.

Phillip Jacob “Jake” Helm

Joseph Andrew McCracken

And, last, but not least, the oldest signature of a direct ancestor that I have collected.  It is the signature from William Hurrie, the ringer of the Liberty Bell.  It is on a document acknowledging receipt of a payment authorized by John Bayard, speaker of the Pennsylvania Assembly.

Another interesting thing about William’s signature is that unlike the others, he most likely learned to write in Scotland or England before immigrating to the United States.  He spells his name “Hurrie.”  Meanwhile, others that appear to be related or associated with him spelled their name “Hurry.”  Records intermix the spellings and his gravestone spells it as “Hurry.”  However, this shows the spelling that he used.

William Hurrie

 

 

 

Featured Image: Credit to StockSnap via pixabay.com

Prompt: Written

#52ancestors52weeks

 

 

My Grandma Dessie May (Thomas) Pellett had rules around which of her daughters, even as adults, could cook which items.  One of the items that was “assigned” to my Aunt Inez Linda Pellett (yes, I was named after her), was Chicken and Noodles.  Well, actually, just the noodles part.

 

My Memories

Growing up, my sister and I spent most Saturday nights with my Grandma Dessie May (Thomas) Pellett and my two unmarried aunts Inez Linda Pellett and Ruby Arlene Pellett.  After church on Sunday was generally the most special meal of the week.  Occasionally, that included a big pot of chicken and noodles.

 

Making the Stock

As I recall, grandma would boil bone-in chicken in water and would add carrot and celery to the water to create a stock.  Of course, it also included salt and pepper.  However, I am not sure that she included onion, which is often a part of stock.  When the stock was ready and the chicken well cooked.  The carrot, celery, skin, and bones were removed.  The chicken was shredded and it was time for the noodles.

 

Making the Noodles

Inez made noodles using  a relatively simple recipe.  For a single batch, I use one egg, 2 tablespoons of milk, a teaspoon of salt, and a cup of flour.  Inez used the same ingredients.  I am not sure if she just doubled it or if she had a slightly different recipe.  But she either made more dough or magically created more noodles out of the same dough.

After the ingredients are mixed, let the dough sit for at least 10 minutes.  Then comes the UNIQUE part of the recipe.  Unlike most recipes where they make thick or broad noodles, these noodles were cut super, super thin.  To do that roll the dough in batches such that it is paper thin.  Then fold the dough over several times and cut it with a sharp knife in narrow strips no wider than 1/8 of an inch.  A 1/16 of an inch is even better.

Let the noodles dry completely.  To do that spread them on baking sheets.  I usually let them dry about 2 hours turning them every 30 minutes.

Bring the stock to a boil and add the noodles.  Cook till tender, which generally requires about 15 to 20 minutes of cooking.  Yum!

 

Why is this a special recipe?

I think what makes it special and different is having so much surface area on the noodles.  Everyone loves it.  I have never known anyone from the time I was young to the present to turn down a bowl of these noodles.  They even love them when I am lazy and substitute store bought stock and use boneless chicken. 

The biggest dilemma is how much to make.  I remember once when I made chicken and noodles for Dad, my sister, and my family.  I made four times this recipe and I got complaints because we ran out before everyone got as much as they wanted!

Today, if the family is all together, I make two large pots of the chicken and noodles with extra chicken on the side.

 

Featured Image: AI generated by Krimker via Pixabay.com

Prompt: Family Recipe

#52ancestors52weeks