Was the first known Passco/Pasco Peelle really named Isaac?  Where did the name Passco come from?  And, why did it stick being a family name for generations?

 

The Early Days

Robert (b. 1709) and his wife Elizabeth (Edgerton) Peelle, my 5th great grandparents, were Quakers.  They married in 1728, likely in Nansemond County, Virginia.  Following the tradition of previous generations, they perpetuated the name Robert by giving that name to their first son.  Then, in 1733, they had another son, who would become my 4th great grandfather.

The debate is about the name they gave him at birth.  Although all the records that I have found except one indicate his name is Passco, his father’s first will lists his name as Isaac.  Within the month, the will was modified with several changes.  In the new will, he is listed as Passco.  Some people assume that the first will indicates that Isaac is his “real” name and that it was changed in the updated will to his nickname or preferred name.  However, I wonder if Isaac was simply an error that was corrected in the second version of the will.

 

Taking A look at the Records

Birth

The Quaker records list his name with his birth date showing it as Passco/Pasco with a birthdate of 29th day, 7th month of 1733.  This translates to July 29, 1733 based on the way Quakers dated their records.  This is an original handwritten record.  However, it was made years after his birth, having been recorded in The Register of Births and Deaths of the People Called Quakers belonging to Rich Square Monthly Meeting in North Carolina County of Northampton  likely  in the 1760s soon after the Rich Square meeting house was built.

 

Marriage

Although Passco is believed to have married Tabitha Dunigan/Dunagan around 1755, no record of their marriage has been found.  It is unclear where they married, but given the family’s history being in the Society of Friends before and after that date, they likely married at a Quaker Meeting House.  Tabitha stated at some point that she didn’t know how old she was because the meeting house burnt.  If they married where she lived, it is possible that their marriage record burnt as well.

 

Business

The earliest recorded record for Passco was in 1759.  December 18th of that year, he signed a petition for the formation of Hertford County, North Carolina.  He used the name Passco.  Thus, either he had either been named Passco at birth or had used the name so much that he used it in his business transactions.  That said, in those early years before and after the birth of our country, a person could use any name they wanted as there was no official legal name for a person.

In 1780/1781, he used the same name when signing petitions to the General Assembly of North Carolina requesting new commissioners. 

 

Land

Passco became the owner of property in Dobbs County, North Carolina in an area which later became Wayne County.  He was granted 640 acres adjoining William Newsome on the east side of Basses Swamp. He received a subsequent grant for additional land adjoining that property.  Both were issued to “Passco Peelle” (or a form of that name).

 

Tax Lists & Censuses

Additionally, the 1786 and 1788 tax lists, give his name as Passcow.  We pronounce Passco as “pass” “co.”  However, in those days, they very well may have pronounced it “pass” “cow.”  Thus, the name may have been recorded the way it sounded.  Then in 1790 and 1800, the census records list his name as Pasco.

 

One Last Record

Finally, when his daughter Anna married Thomas Parker at the Piney Grove Monthly Meeting in Marlboro, South Carolina in 1803, his name was recorded as Passco Peelle.

 

The Wills

Given his business records show the name as some form of Passco, it seems reasonable to take a look at the document that gave his name as Isaac.  It clearly isn’t just a misunderstanding of what is written in the will as the handwriting, although not perfect throughout the will, perfectly states the name as “Isaac.” 

 

Robert Peelle IV’s original will showing the name Isaac

 

The second will written only twenty days later is essentially the same with Isaac changed to Passco, the spelling of Peele changed to Peelle, and at least one item being added to the will.

 

Revised will of Robert Peelle IV showing the name Passco.  Note that in this era two “s'”s together were written in cursive in a way that looks much live a curvie “f.”

 

Neither name appears to be a family name prior to this point.  However, both names show up in the family tree after this point with Passco/Pasco being common among Passco’s descendants.

In his own will, his name is written “Pascho Peelle.”  There is no reference to the name Isaac.  Additionally, he had followed the family tradition of naming his first son Robert.  However, Robert had died as a child.  His only two living sons at the time of his death were John and William. 

My Conclusion

It is possible that an early Quaker record exists that lists Passco’s name as Isaac.  In absence of such a record, I conclude it is very likely that Passco was his given name at birth and not a nickname.  In either case, the real question is “Where did the name Passco come from?”

 

Where Did The Name come from?

John Pasco was an immigrant to Virginia in the early days before the Revolutionary war.

A Pasco Curle lived in Elizabeth City as early as 1699.

Pascal/Pascow/Pasco Herbert also lived in Elizabeth City.  At first look, he appears to have connections to the Curle family.

Did one of these people inspire the naming of Passco Peelle?

Featured image: By gerald via pixabay.com

Prompt: Nickname

#52ancestors52weeks

 

 

It is said that a picture is worth a thousand words. This one is also worth a thousand memories.  Not only did my ancestors and other relatives live in and around Hiattville from its earliest days, I have fond memories of visiting that very building shown in the photograph.

 

The Photograph

The photo was taken sometime after A.M. Routh rebuilt his store following the Hiattville fire of 1905, which devastated many of the businesses in town.  It was published on a postcard by the Central Postcard Company in Fort Scott, Kansas sometime between 1907 and 1914.  And, it was sent to my grandma Nellie Peelle sometime before she married March 4, 1914.  I don’t know the exact year as it has no postmark.  Since it was sent locally, the postman simply took a pencil and made marks across the stamp.  Thus, it was delivered the same day it was sent.

 

The Store

When I was growing up, this building was Salmon’s Grocery.  Imo and Don Salmon ran the store from 1943 until 1973, although it seems their store was in another building in the early days.  The building looked very much the same when I was growing up except that it had gas pumps and benches out front.  As a kid, my favorite two things about the store were the candy counter and the pop machine.  The candy counter was a big display case where a quarter could buy a small bag of candy and gum.  I remember the wax teeth, sour apple suckers, bubble gum, big jawbreakers, and the SweeTart necklaces. 

In those days, soda pop wasn’t something that people drank regularly.  It was a real joy to get a bottle and move it through the tracks, finally getting it out of the machine.  I think the anticipation was half the fun.  There was nothing better than a strawberry Nehi.

We didn’t do our regular grocery shopping at Salmon’s as their selection was limited, but would stop in if we needed something.  In addition, we raised chickens and would sell eggs to them.  And, I believe at least one year, we sold strawberries to them.

My funny story about the store . . . One day the phone rang.  Mom answered and the person on the other end of the phone said, “I think I left my pot on your bench.”  The person was trying to reach the store.  She had left a cooking pot on the bench out front of the store.

 

My Family

I am not aware that any of the people in the photo are my family.  However, it is very possible that one of the members of the family ventured into the photograph as numerous of them lived in and near Hiattville from its earliest days.

 

Thomas & Ellen Hartnett Family

Early Residents

Hiattville began its official formation in 1872 when the name of the post office was officially changed from Pawnee to Hiattville.  I don’t know exactly when Thomas and Ellen D. (Jury) Harnett set foot in what became Hiattville.  However, they were both living in Pawnee Township, which includes Hiattville, when they married on February 12, 1873.  October 4, 1874, their son, John, was the first child born in Hiattville.  Note: Historic Reflections of Bourbon County, Kansas incorrectly gives their last name as Hartwell instead of Hartnett. 

The 1880 census is the first census that recognizes Hiattville as a village.  Thomas and Ellen’s household was one of five in the new town, which had a total of 35 residents with 10 of them living at Thomas’ home.  Thomas and three of their boarders worked for the railroad, which was the primary reason Hiattville existed.  Two of the men were from Ireland, Thomas’ birth country.  They also had a doctor from Arkansas, a servant from Germany, and two teenage young men from Illinois, who were the telegraph operators. 

It was quite a group and I am imagining listening to conversation in the household.  The mix of proper English (Ellen was of a very proper English background), Irish brogue, German, and the southern twang of someone from Arkansas must have been quite interesting.

By 1885, my great-grandmother Matilda (Jury) Peelle, Ellen’s niece, had joined the household.  She lived with them until she married in 1892.  Thomas, Ellen, and their three children lived in or close to Hiattville the remainder of their lives.  In 1890, the family moved to their farm two miles north of town.

This story tells you a bit about the Hartnett family.

Read more about the Jury family’s story.

 

In and Around The Town

Passco Peelle
Martha (Johnson) Peelle

Arriving In the Area

In 1879, Passco and Martha (Johnson) Peelle and three of their younger children (William J., Lillie, and Mossie) moved to a farm north of Hiattville.  William J. took care of business and arrived in Kansas after his father.  He came by train from Indiana arriving at the little Hiattville station.  Read more about their move to Kansas.

 

Hiattville Map showing land ownership. Pink-Passco Peelle; Green-William J. Peelle; Blue-Walter Jury; Turquoise-Wilburt Jury; Orange-Grocery. Map Source: Historic Reflections of Bourbon County, Kansas

Moving Into Town

In August of 1891, Passco bought lots in the bustling town of Hiattville, which was rapidly growing.  He purchased lots in the area of the original town (pink).  That November, William J. (my great-grandfather) purchased lots in the Wallace Addition (green).  They moved into Hiattville; however, they continued to own the property north of Hiattville.

William J. later switched two lots with A.M. Routh, owner of the grocery store (orange) in the photo, via each of them doing quit claim deeds the same day.  He switched for the lots on the southeast corner of Pine and Broadway.  This gave him four lots that were co-located rather than having them a block apart.  These lots were a portion of the lots that had earlier been owned by William J.’s wife Matilda (Jury) Peelle’s brother Walter, who had at one time owned six lots on that corner (blue).

Matilda’s brother Wilburt and his wife Susan (Stubberts) Peelle also owned property for a time in Hiattville.  However, it was a few blocks away (turquoise).

 

Busy Bee

Prior to the move, William J. was a popular carpenter and farmer.  In Hiattville, he kept even busier.  He had a shop and was called on to create many different items in addition to building additions to homes and businesses.  Of course, life at home was busy also since William J. had married Matilda soon after moving to Hiattville and they soon had a growing family.  Read more about William J.’s life as a carpenter and farmer.

 

William Johnson Peelle
Matilda (Jury) Peelle

Out To The Country

Hiattville was booming, but for some unknown reason William J. and Passco decided to move their families out of town.  So, they sold the properties that they had only purchased three years prior.  Although the town was growing, William J.’s property hadn’t increased in value a lot. However, Passco sold his lots in the original town for a whopping $1500.  He had purchased them when they moved to town for a mere $650.

The family, all three generations, moved into a house southwest of Hiattville.  This house was a big two-story, which sat just feet from where Don and Kay (McCracken) Davis lived for years.  

After that they lived in multiple locations within a few miles of Hiattville, including moving back to their first Kansas home.  Their last home together was the home southeast of Hiattville that became known as the Homeplace. Read more about the Homeplace.

 

Hiattville Address

Many others in the family have had a Hiattville address at one time or the other.  In the earliest days letters and postcards were simply addressed to the person with an address of Hiattville, Kansas.  Later, a route number was added.  Eventually, people living in and around Hiattville had a zip code of 66747.

Some of the family members that lived around Hiattville at one time or another include:  Joe and Nellie (Peelle) McCracken and all their children, Dewey and Jackie McCracken, Don and Kay (McCracken) Davis and family, Weldon and Ester (McCracken) Fisher, Evaline (Peelle) Farmer and children, Donald and Bernetta (Ellis) Rhoades, and John and Harriett (Warner) Jury and family.  And, of course, Mom, Dad, sis, and me. I am sure I missed somebody that should be included in that list.

 

Theo “Bud” Thomas

Until The Post Office Closed

Mom’s uncle, Theo “Bud” Thomas, who lived just outside Hiattvile, was the town’s postmaster for 21 years.  However, he wasn’t just the postmaster, he literally owned the building and almost all of the contents.  Only one filing cabinet and a mailbox outside belonged the United States Postal Service.  Everything else including the post boxes belonged to him.  After he retired, he had the post boxes in his home.

Soon after Bud retired, they limited the hours the post office was open each day to two hours in the morning.  Those hours didn’t work for people who had employment.  Thus, several chose to change to home delivery.  On June 30, 1986, they closed the post office claiming that there were concerns about the safety of the old building that stood by the railroad.  They did not feel it was economical to come up with another solution as Hiattville was down to 16 people getting their mail at the post office.

The remaining customers were moved to home delivery.  To resolve the issue of purchasing stamps, they allowed people to buy them from the postal carrier.  A person could leave money in the mail box and the postal carrier would leave stamps if they had them.  If not, they would leave them in the mailbox the next day. 

 

Today

Once topping out at around 500 inhabitants, the bustling town of Hiattville has now been reduced to a small collection of houses.  The small town once had three or four churches.  Today, only the Methodist Church stands.  And, the tracks for the  railroad, which at one time carried 10-15 freight trains and two passenger trains per day, have been removed.  All the businesses have closed, including the store in the photo, the lumberyards, and the bank.  Additionally, the days that the school was open are now a distant memory.  Besides the church, the main things that remain are the two cemeteries and memories of a different time.

 

Prompt: Favorite photo

#52ancestors52weeks

 

 

 

When people think of handing down things, often they think of people handing down clothes to younger siblings or handing down family heirlooms to the next generation.  This article, however, takes a look at some of the other things, many non-material, that were handed down from one generation to the next in the Peelle family.

 

Handed Down In Families

Families also pass down skills, abilities, interests, beliefs, lifestyle, culture, longevity, stories, tendencies for particular diseases and more.  Some of them genetically and others via teaching or sharing with their children.  All things they “hand down” to the next generation are important as they are important components in making the next generation who they are.

This article takes a look at some physical traits and then touches on several other things that were passed down in the Peelle family.

 

Hair & Eyes

Physical traits handed down from generation to generation are more obvious in some families than others.  The Peelle family is one family where physical traits are interesting. 

 

Passco & Martha

It was said that Martha (Johson) Peelle had very dark or black hair and dark eyes.  The first photograph, which is believed to be Passco and Martha (Johnson) Peelle soon after they married, shows that she has very dark hair.  The details aren’t clear.  However, her eyes do appear dark.  Passco appears to have a bit lighter hair.  His skin appears a bit ruddy, likely from being in the sun.

The next two photographs show Martha and Passco in their later years.  Their hair has grayed; however, it is clear that Martha has dark eyes.  Passco’s eyes, on the other hand, are not clear in the photograph.

Tiny photograph believed to be Passco & Martha (Johnson) Peelle soon after their marriage.
Martha (Johnson) Peelle
Passco Peelle

 

 

 

 

 

The Kids

The next group of photographs show six of Passco and Martha’s eight children.  Unfortunately, I didn’t have photographs of all the children.  Additionally the children vary in age, which is not ideal.

The first image is Mossie Lea (Peelle) Wilkie.  Although her hair and eyes do not appear as dark as Martha’s, she clearly favors her mother.  She has brown hair and brown eyes.

The second image is Emaline “Lillie’ (Peelle) Potter.  Since she is older, her hair color is not known.  However, she clearly has brown eyes.

William Johnson Peelle is the third image.  His hair is a much lighter brown and his eyes appear to be light.  Thus, likely blue.

On the next row is Rachel (Peelle) Benson.  Her hair is very dark, possibly black.  However, her eyes do not seem as dark as Lillie’s.  They appear to possibly be blue.

The next is Elzena “Jennie” (Peelle) Lewis.  Her eyes appear very dark  and her hair, although not well seen appears to be reasonably dark.

The last photo is of Sarah (Peelle) Longnecker.  Her hair is dark, but possibly not as dark as some of the others.  However, she seems to have lighter eyes.

 

Rachel (Peelle) Benson and four of her children

The Grandkids

Example: Rachel’s Children

Using Rachel (Peelle) Benson and her children as an example, it can be seen that three of the four appear to have dark brown hair with one having lighter brown or blond hair.  The three females appear to have brown eyes with her son William’s eyes being unclear in the photograph.

William’s military draft record, however, clarifies the situation stating that he has brown hair and blue eyes. His brother Emmerson’s records say that he also has blue eyes and states that his hair is dark.

 

Overall View

I took a look at the hair and eye color for as many as of Martha and Passco’s grandchildren where I could determined even one of the two attributes.  Much of the information came from draft registrations.  I supplemented it with my best guess of each by looking at photographs.  Given that the photographs were almost all black and white, it is a bit of a guess.  Yet, it is quite interesting.  When looking at hair color a majority had brown, dark brown, or black hair.  About 30% had light or blonde hair.  It is interesting that given the hair color that over 50% of the grandchildren had blue eyes.

 

With the exception of one of Passco and Martha’s children, all of them appeared to have had children with a range of hair color from light to dark.  In that particular family, none of the kids had light hair or blue eyes.  The remaining families had either a mix of blue and brown eyes or exclusively blue eyes.

 

Nellie (Peelle) McCracken & Lydia Peelle

Example: Grandma & Her Sister Lydia

The photograph demonstrates the differences in coloring between Grandma Nellie (Peelle) McCracken and her sister Lydia.  Grandma’s hair is light and she had very light blue eyes.  Meanwhile, Lydia’s coloring is much darker as she had brown to dark brown hair with brown eyes.

Grandma clearly favors her father’s coloring (See William Johnson Peelle above).  Lydia, on the other hand, appears to be darker than her mother and her grandfather John Jury, Sr.  Thus, it would appear that she probably got part of her hair and eye color from Martha Peelle.

That is, if she is in fact a full sister to Grandma Nellie.  Given the stark differences in their coloring, I have considered if she was actually William J. Peelle’s daughter or not.  Her mother Matilda (Jury) Peelle was pregnant when she married William J. Peelle.  Thus, adding even more intrigue.  However, this question will likely never be answered since Lydia did not have any children. 

 

Their brother Pat’s coloring was somewhere in-between Grandma’s and Lydia’s.  This makes it seem more likely that they were all full siblings.

 

The Hair Line

Another thing that was passed down to many of the Peelle men is the hairline.  It is shown of an unknown man in the Peelle family.  If you look at William Johnson Peelle’s hairline and Passco’s hairline, you will see that they are similar.  Passco’s is more noticeable in the picture when he was younger.

Longevity

Passco and Martha each lived into their eighties, giving their descendants a good foundation for a long life.

This chart clearly shows that if a person in the family made it to adulthood, that they had a high chance of living into their seventies or eighties.  It is not uncommon that multiple people had heart related issues that caused or contributed to their death.  This occurs a lot in families.

One set of deaths that is a bit unusual is that of Mossie Lea (Peelle) Wilkie and her son Ollie Wilkie.  Mossie took a cold in 1905 and it quickly worsened.  Nine days later she died of pneumonia.  Two years later, her son Ollie became suddenly ill while visiting friends.  A few days later, he died from pneumonia.  It seems that they both had a weakness that allowed pneumonia to quickly overtake them.

 

Personality

Although each person has their own personality, some personality traits tend to run in families.  One of the areas that the Peelle’s were similar is being strong minded.

 

Strong Minded

In my experience the Peelle’s and their descendants were very strong minded.  As Grandma Nellie, who to most people would seem as a quiet, very nice lady, would say, “My head is made up!”  This meant that you didn’t need to even argue your case that something was different than her point of view because she had already decided.  I know a few cousins where this definition fits.  I have also communicated with distant cousins where this was definitely the case.  They were sure they were right no matter what evidence exists or doesn’t exist.

 

Interests/Skills

Occupation

When considering occupations, one has to dig a big deeper as Martha and Passco had only one son.  That said, most of this branch of the family farmed as their primary occupation.  However, the Peelle family also continued an interest in law as Passco’s brother and multiple of Passco’s brother John’s children practiced law.  In our family line, William Johnson Peelle did not practice law, but was very interested in it.  He attended trials from time to time.  In addition, he was involved in several inquests when someone died.

Does that interest and knowledge transfer to the next generation automatically via DNA? Or, does the next generation learn and absorb via being around family members?  I can’t answer that question with certainty.  However, I have been accused by multiple people of having a background in law.  And, I know that my parents did not express that interest to me while I was growing up.

 

Education

Another area of interest seemed to be education.  Both the McCracken and Peelle families seemed to emphasize education.  Great grandfather William Johnson Peelle was always attending different events in the evening – literary, spelling classes, debate, etc.  He also practiced his writing by writing brief entries in his journals.  It would be interesting to do a survey of the Peelle family and see the grade level of education attained through the generations.

 

Jack of All Trades

Life in the 1800s led many people to be jack of all trades.  This was true of women and men, although it was different skills for the men and women.  However, this seemed to be more prominent in the Peelle family than it was in some other families.  For instance, William J. Peelle was a carpenter and farmer by trade.  What is interesting is that his carpentry included making anything and everything.  He made tools, wagon beds, crutches, rudimentary furniture, and houses/rooms added to houses.

His carpentry skills clearly meant that he had good visualization skills as he had no set of plans or diagrams to work from.  In some cases, he didn’t even have another similar item to view before making the new item.  Dad also had excellent visualization skills, which I suspect he got from both his mother’s and father’s families.  Matter of fact, he had a semi-photographic memory as does one of my sons.  Dad could visualize pages from books that he had read.  This skill came in handy when working on cars and machinery as he could visualize how the parts needed to go back together.

 

The Stories

Most families hand down some stories.  In the case of the Peelle family, the most famous story they handed down is that Passco’s grandmother Tabitha (Dunigan) Peelle was the daughter of President John Adams, conceived out of wedlock.  It was assumed by cousins that this relationship was the reason that William Adams Peelle, Passco’s brother, was given the middle name of Adams. 

A scrap of paper exists with the claim of Tabitha’s parentage written on it by a member of the family back in the 1800s.  However, it also has other incorrect information on the same paper.

Personally, I have not seen any actual facts that lead me to conclude that the story is true, but some distant cousins have their heads made up! (See, they got it, too!)

 

 

 

 

Family history is about facts and stories.  However, it is also interesting to look at it from a statistical perspective.  Statistics about a family can include number of direct ancestors, size of family tree, immigration years, longevity, causes of death, military service branches, occupations, political leanings, religious beliefs, and more.  This article takes a look at a few set of statistics using both numerical and  visual methods.

 

 

Family Tree Size

The chart shows the size of my official trees compared to the size of the same tree on Ancestry.com.  It might seem odd that they are different sizes.  Many people synchronize their trees on ancestry.com with their local tree.  However, I have chosen not to do that.  In part, I use the tree on ancestry when researching people or entire family lines (e.g. Lemuel McCracken’s ancestry).  In that case, I have added many people to my tree online that I haven’t yet attached to the family or where I have created a temporary attachment that allows me to do additional searching. (And, yes, I make notes on them that they are not confirmed relationships.)

You will notice that in the case of Rod’s family that the online tree is actually smaller.  This comes from data that we learned in places other than ancestry.com.  In the case of my family, much of the information I had from other sources was already in my tree before I did an initial upload.

You will also notice a huge difference in the size of Rod’s family tree and my family tree.  The primary reason, besides the fact that I have been researching my family tree for a longer period of time, is that three of his family lines immigrated to the United States in the mid-1850s while most of my family lines immigrated prior to that time.  See the Immigration section for more details.

 

Military

The chart shows the relatives in our families that served in the Revolutionary War by surname with the surnames grouped by color into the various family lines.  It demonstrates that the Klinefelter family line had the most participants followed by the Ellis family line.  See Soldiers and Fireworks for more charts about military service.

Immigration

McCracken-Pellett

The chart shows the earliest year that I can confirm each family line was in the United States.  In some cases, it is when the family immigrated to the United States.  However, often it is the earliest record for someone in that family line.  For example, if I show someone was born in the United States in 1780 and I have no records that show the specific date that the family came to the country (or Colonies), it would be included in the 1751-1800 range.

Of the families identified back as far as my 5th great grandparents, a vast majority of them were in the United States prior to 1800.  Five of those identified never immigrated to the United States. It is very likely that with additional research that some of the families where I do not know a firm immigration date will be found to have been in the country at an earlier time period than their current category.

The forty that are yet to be determined are in that category either because I hit a brick wall in research or more likely simply because I haven’t had time to research those families in depth.  I suspect that they will split with a smaller percentage having early arrival dates and the larger percentage never having immigrated.

 

Immigration

Thomson – Helm

The Thomson-Helm chart looks very different than the McCracken-Pellett chart. You will notice that the number of families with known dates in the United States or Colonies is much smaller.  This is because three of Rod’s four main family lines did not immigrated to the United States until the mid-1800s.

Of the 103 family lines that are not yet determined, a vast majority are expected to fall into the category of “Never Immigrated.”  With additional research many of these can be verified.  However, a portion of them are from Eastern Europe likely in or near Poland and Ukraine.  These family lines may be impossible to trace with any accuracy.

Name Infographic

Helm

Phillip & Mary, their children, grandchildren, and the spouses

This image shows the prevalence of given names in Phillip and Mary Helm’s family.  I created it for a post about the confusion around the Helm family due to so many people having the same or similar names.  This type of graphic does not include the numerical values.  Instead, it demonstrates the values using the size of the text.  Clearly, the variations of the name Wilhelm/Wilhelmena are the most common name in the family.  The actual numbers aren’t always important when looking at trends or prevalence of certain pieces of data.  This type of chart can also be useful in looking at locations of birth/death, causes of death, or any other piece of data or characteristic with repetitive values.

The blog Helm Confusion further discusses information about this graphic.

 

 

Age at Time of Death

Pellett

The chart shows the age of death of members of the Pellett family.  My mom is the person in the center semi-circle.  This provides a visual that shows not only age of death of ancestors, but also trends (or lack there of) by generation and by family line.

One thing that is obvious from this chart is that the further back the generation the younger people tended to die on average.  That said, you will see examples of people living longer back many generations.  So, the fact that the average lifespan today is greater than it was generations ago seems to be based a lot on eradicating  and minimizing childhood diseases and  the availability of more advanced medical assistance rather than any changes that make humans naturally live longer.

In the chart, the ones that died very young often are women who died in childbirth.  When all the charts are completed (Okay, created.  With genealogy, nothing is ever complete), this chart will have a companion chart that shows cause of death when known.  This will give a bit of insight into the correlation between age of death and cause of death.

It is also interesting to look at the age of death compared to location, time period, and cause of death.  One of my observations, which is not proven, is that early settlers in cities often lived longer than their descendants who moved westward. 

I have a section on the website for Statistics.  The Earliest Ancestor sections have data in them.  However, most other sections are blank right now.  Expect this section of the website to start to take shape in 2025.

DNA

Lemuel & Louisiana

 

Descendants of Lemuel and Louisiana

This chart is focused specifically on DNA matches related to my research of Lemuel L. and Louisiana (Matteer) McCracken.  The first three entries show that 95 total descendants of Lemuel and/or Louisiana have taken DNA tests with one of the companies that members of our closer family have tested.  A considerable majority of them are descendants of the children that they had together.  However, it is possible that additional descendants have tested with other companies or simply do not match as third cousins and beyond are not guaranteed to match.

 

McCracken DNA Matches

The 80 DNA matches who have been identified as descendants of James  & Rachel (Kelly) McCracken show why this couple appears to be Lemuel’s maternal grandparents or great-grandparents (Y-DNA indicates Peppard is likely our paternal line).  It does include descendants of a couple of people that are not proven by records to be their grandchildren, but where DNA and available data indicate that it is very likely that they are members of this family. 

 

Peppard DNA Matches

Similarly, the 119 matches to descendants of Johnathan and Elizabeth (Gilmore) Peppard indicate why they are believed to be Lemuel’s grandparents.  In this case, there are another 18 matches that are in the Bailey family.  However, this specific Bailey family has a Y-DNA match to the Peppard family along with many autosomal matches to the Peppard family.  Thus, it is believed that this specific Bailey family descends from the Peppard family despite a different paper trail. 

The graphic also shows a group of matches through Louisiana to the Matteer family.  We do have a paper trail on Louisiana back to her parents.  However, the DNA matches help prove in her family line.

Additionally, several hundred DNA matches to Louisiana have been identified that are believed to fit into several earlier generations of her family.  This information will be shared when it is finalized. 

I have worked more on Lemuel’s ancestors since I have been working to identify his parents.  In his case, an additional 1200 matches have been identified that are believed to most likely be related to Lemuel.  However, it is possible that some of them are not actually connected the way they appear.

 

 

Newspapers reported that although they could report on John Peelle’s stories, a person had to hear them directly from John to properly appreciate them.  He told many of the same stories over and over.  Yet, it seemed the people of Wayne County, Indiana never grew tired of hearing them. 

Old Settlers Organization

Organizing

The Old Settler’s Organization held an organizing meeting on July 21, 1855.  John Peelle, son of Passco and Tabitha (Dunigan) Peelle, was not only a founding member, but was also elected to serve as one of the two vice-presidents.

On September 7, 1855, they met at the Temperance Hall in Richmond.  Four rules were adopted:

  • Meetings would start with a prayer.
  • Old settlers would share stories about how things were in the olden days, how things had changed, interesting incidences, etc.
  • They were to make each other sociable and agreeable.
  • A book would be obtained to record the names of old settlers, their age, and when they came to the area.

 

The Program

After the business was complete, a program was held.  The auditor brought records from the county clerks office which showed the growth in the county based on the very small amount of paper required for tax records in 1819 compared to 350 large pages that were needed for the same task in the most recent accounting.

The auditor also presented records that showed that the Board of County Commissioners fixed rates for taverns in those early days.  Prices were fixed for meals, lodging, whisky, beer, brandy, and wine.  By 1855, this was not in effect.

Following the information shared by the auditor, some of the men began sharing their stories.  It was on this day that John told his story to the old settlers for the first time.  However, it would be far from the last time as he was a highly requested speaker and told his story over and over for years to come.  In his later years, he would begin, “I have so often told you the same old story, that you know it by heart.”

 

Old North “Carliner”

His story would usually start with his birth on March 27, 1791 near (David) Beard’s Hatters Shop in Wayne County, Old North Carolina or “Carliner,” as he would say.  He told of the early days before the cotton gin was common.  Everything with cotton had to be done by hand.  He was required to pick seeds from the cotton.  He admitted that sometimes he burnt some of the cotton to cut down on the number of seeds that needed to be picked out.

 

Indiana Here We Come

When he was a young man, John became restless and went on an adventure to Indiana Territory, arriving in August 1813.  He worked near Richmond for only a few days and then worked for another man for $10 per month.  John had only a tin of milk and a similar amount of mush to eat.  He claimed, “He had often got up from his meals, oh! So hungry, and with tearsi n his eyes.”  It made him long for North Carolina, where people had two-part homes.  One part where they lived and slept and another where they cooked and ate.  He eventually returned to North Carolina. 

 

The Silver Dollar

On March 6, 1815, he married Penina “Penny” Pate.  John paid the minister, who married Penina and him, with a silver dollar that he claimed was once owned by John Wesley.  Now, how someone who grew up in the Society of Friends (Quakers) would have come to have a coin once owned by John Wesley, a Methodist leader who died prior to John’s birth, is unknown.  However, I am sure John had a story about it.

At the Old Settler’s picnics, he would often pull out a silver dollar (or English shilling, as some report) that he said was a mate to the one that he had paid when he married the prettiest woman in “North Caroliner.”  Even when she was in her seventies, he stated that he had never seen a prettier one – ever.

His story did not end there.  He went on to explain why he had kept the coin.  He said that at the time of his marriage that witches were very bad in the Carolinas.  If a man had no money, they would eat him.  Thus, he kept the silver dollar so that he always had money on him.  Now, never mind that in his story about the early days in Indiana, he says that he arrived in the territory without any money.  Details, details, details . . .

 

Moving West

On March 6, 1815, he married Penina “Penny” Pate in South Carolina.  Three days after John and Penina married, they piled their belongings into a two-horse wagon, said, “Good-bye” to their friends and family, and left for Indiana. 

John and Penina arrived in Indiana in October.  They had been on the road for seven months.  Their journey had taken them through the Appalachian Mountains, across streams and rivers, and through wilderness.

They stopped where Richmond, Indiana stands.  They found John Smith selling goods in a small building on the corner of Front St. and Main St.  Although Main St. still exists, I have not yet identified this specific location.

 

Life In Indiana

John and Penina settled in Randolph County, Indiana just to the north of Wayne County.  They cleared the land and made a home.  It was here that their first child, a son, was born.

John and Penina had grown up in the Society of Friends (Quaker) faith.  However, after the Methodist Episcopal Church formed in the area, they became early members.  It was the “old religion” as the pioneers would later say.  They thought “old religion” was better than “new religion.”  One factor seemed to be that in the days of few settlers clearing the wilderness to create farms everyone for miles around was considered a neighbor and friend that could be counted on.

 

Hard Times

Those early days in Indiana were not easy.  He claimed he arrived in Indiana with no money.  Now, he may have meant that he had no significant money.  In any case, “he traded his wagon for a cow and some sheep.”  As he told it, “Dogs killed his sheep, his horse died,” and the cow killed itself by drinking syrup.

In those early days, John would make money by killing wolves.  The county would pay a small amount for each wolf scalp that he brought in.  Despite this, he said that he was not a skilled hunter.  Still, on one occasion, he claimed to have killed two wild geese with one shot.

John’s story of hardship in the old days continued, “You know the plow made of a forked stick; the cotton rope traces; my tanning of leather or pretending to for the purpose of making my wife’s shoes, which hurt her feet to this day.  You know I have told you before that after I came to this state, I often got up from the table hungry.  I sighed with tears in my eyes for my mother’s milk house in North Carolina.”  He went on to say that he thought he had “seen as hard times as the next man.”

 

Things Are Looking Up

John kept a positive outlook on life.  He stated, “We soon raised plenty of corn and squashes and pumpkins on which we fared sumptuously.  We used to hand around a basket of turnips in place of apples.  I remember once at a neighbor’s house I did not scrape the turnip as close as the good lady of the house thought I ought to; so she scraped it again and ate it herself!”

 

Wayne County

John and Penina stayed in Randolph County two years before moving to Wayne County.  Their new property was approximately two miles north of where New Garden was laid out in 1818.  The name of New Garden was changed to Newport in 1834.  Today the town is called Fountain City with the last name change occurring in 1878.  Here they again cleared the land to create a farm.  Their last 11 of 12 children were born in this home.

Around 1854 or 1855, John and Penina made a move again.  This time they moved to Centerville, the county seat of Wayne County.

 

The Old Settlers Picnics

Living in Centerville was convenient for anyone involved in Old Settlers.  Although some meetings were held in Richmond, many of the picnics over the years were held at the Centerville Fair Grounds or in nearby groves.

By 1875, the 20th year of the organization, the Old Settlers Picnics had grown tremendously.  The crowd was estimated at 4000 people, a bit over four times the population of the town.  It drew people from the surrounding areas and even some old settlers who had moved far away returned for the annual event.

 

Events of the Day

Over the years the event had settled into a general pattern.  The picnics generally opened with a prayer sometime in the mid to late morning.  Often music followed and possibly a speech or two would be given to complete the morning.

Dinner (noon meal) was a time to eat the food they carried in while enjoying their surroundings and  conversing with new and old friends and neighbors.

After dinner, they would tend to the business of determining officers and people for planning next year’s event.  Typically, that was followed by  speeches by old settlers and the displaying of old items.  When known, the history, usage, or story about items was also explained.  Occasionally, special guests would also speak.

Music was also inter-weaved into the event with both bands and singing.  The event ended with the playing and/or singing of “Yankee Doodle.”

By now, the regulars like John Peelle, and their stories were well known to most of the members of the crowd.  John was known to many as Uncle John.  However, he referred to himself simply as “Old Peelle.” 

Besides the stories previously mentioned, he spoke of wearing leather pants, nettle shirts, and going completely without breeches wearing instead a gown that tied close at the neck.  Apparently, he also had some interesting adventures serving as constable.  However, two stories seem to stick out as favorites . . .

 

 

 

 Old Items

Displayed at the Old Settlers’ Picnic

 

Over the years, John displayed various items at the Old Settlers’ events.  These included:

  • An old trumpet
  • An iron wedge that he had brought from North Carolina to split rails
  • A pewter dish
  • Primitive hames
  • A ladder he made in 1813

And in 1872, he brought his great-great grandchild to show off.  Not as something old, but more to show that he was old.

Items displayed by the old settlers were as much as 200 years old and possibly older.  Some of the items displayed by the group over the years include:

  • Clothes & Accessories
    • Bonnet, shirt, hat, pocketbook, wedding vest, knee buckles
  • Household items
    • Table cloth made from fibers of thistle flowers
    • Dinner horn. It was 5 feet long or maybe 6 feet – its length seemed to grow over the years.
    • Cooking utensils
    • Cup and saucer brought to Kentucky in 1776.
  • Work items
    • Plow
    • Powder horn
    • Packsaddle
  • Specialty items
    • Issue of Centerville’s first newspaper (Possibly the first issue)
    • Newspaper announcing George Washington’s death
    • Wooden boxes supposedly made from wood from a tree under which William Penn signed a treaty
    • 1800 piano manufactured in Philadelphia
    • Bullet molds supposedly once owned by Daniel Boone
    • Paint bag once owned by a chief of a group of Native Americans
    • Double barreled flintlock pistol

Judge Peelle

At each reunion, John would have to mention his nephew Judge William Adams Peelle, who was the son of his brother William (my great-great-great grandfather).  In 1820, John had help lead William and his family on their journey from North Carolina to Indiana.  His nephew was an infant at the time the family made the journey.

John would say that “he (William Adams Peelle) was as bad a child as I ever knew.  He cried nearly all the way from North Carolina, for which I often wanted to thrash him.”  John’s brother William explained to John that young William was crying because he had colic.

John also told about William’s adventure in North Carolina.  As a young man, William had gone to North Carolina to see family.  While there he met a young lady and took her to church the following Sunday.  According to The Richmond Independent, he “attracted the attention of the congregation a great deal more than the sermon did, and so William got up and walked out.  But the congregation followed him, and William sat down at the foot of a large pine tree, while the folks eyed his pegged shoes, the greatest curiosity they had ever seen.  William sat at the foot of the tree for awhile, and when he attempted to get up to go home with the girl he brought, he found that the turpentine and tar had run down and stuck him fast!  The people had to cut him loose with their knives.”

John would go on to say that young William had now become “quite a man.”    And, that he was.   William Adams Peelle was a teacher, lawyer, judge, and had served as Indiana Secretary of State. 

 

The Pantaloons

On one occasion, John started to wrap up his talk and leave the stand without telling the full story of the pantaloons.  And, the audience quickly reminded him that without the story of the pantaloons that he was not done.  Apparently, no Old Settler’s picnic would be complete without it.  So famous were John’s pantaloons that a newspaper article about a gathering, which had nothing to do with John Peelle, mentioned this famous story.  Likewise, one newspaper reporter even believed that it was worthwhile to come to the event just to hear the story of the pantaloons one more time.   

As the story goes, at each event John claimed to be wearing the “identical pantaloons” that he had swapped for soon after he came to Indiana Territory.  The pantaloons were snowy white cotton dimity with stripes and steel buttons.  He said that he had gone to a log-rolling contest and had decided to swap pants with Thomas Woodard, another young man in attendance.  Why they exchanged trousers, I do not know.

He went on to explain that they went to the nearby New Garden Meeting House (Quaker), which was a log cabin at the time, to exchange pantaloons.  The Richmond Independent reported that “he said it was the only time he ever saw two gentlemen in such airy a costume inside a church.”  John was quick to point out that no meeting was in progress and that the two men were the only ones inside during the exchange.

John said that when he got the pantaloons that they were tight as skin.  Still, years later he was wearing them.  One day, Penina let out the secret that she had removed the waistband and made other adjustments as John had become a bit thicker around the middle over the years.  I really wondered if this had been a repetitive process and if she had also had to patch the pantaloons.

In 1874, he indicated that he had owned them for 61 years, which would have meant that he got them when he traveled to the area prior to his marriage.  He went on to indicate that he didn’t actually know the true age of the pants, as he didn’t know how old they were when he obtained them. He wondered if there were others that had “survived the wear and tear of time” as well as his.

To emphasize his story and make sure everyone could see his pantaloons, he would often slap his leg.  He was known to take off his jacket and vest for a better view as they were somewhat like overalls with the buttons for suspenders between the shoulder blades.  When he was 86 years of age, he took it a step further and climbed up on a table so that everyone could get a better look.

 

The End of The Stories

An Aging Man

John appeared to have aged gracefully.  On August 15, 1872, the Cambridge City Tribune described John as “aged 83 years and as spry as any boy of 50 or 60.” (Note: John would have only been 81 in 1872.)

Still, John described himself as “a little, poor, worn-out feller.”  The Richmond Daily Independent disagreed saying, “he is a well preserved, bright old gentleman, straight as a cadet, and spry as a cricket genial and pleasant, as an aged Christian ought to be.”

Proving how spry he was, John celebrated his 86th birthday by walking from his home at Centerville to Richmond, Indiana, a distance of approximately 6 miles.  He arrived in Richmond in time to have breakfast with his nephew Judge William A. Peelle.  He returned home that evening.  The Richmond Independent Telegram reported he was “feeling as good as a North Carolina bridegroom.”  The Cambridge City Tribune said that he was “straight in body and morals” and that was why he had lived so long. 

 

The Last Speech

1878 brought John’s last opportunity to tell his stories at the Old Settler’s Picnic.  As usual, the crowd laughed and cheered as the 87-year-old entertained them.  He would only live another few months.

He died April 20, 1879, less than a month after he turned 88.  In their later years, John and Penina had returned to the Society of Friends.  Thus, his death is recorded in their records.

In John’s will dated approximately one year before his death he showed his unwavering affection for his wife by writing “my beloved wife Penina who has been my partner in life.”  Calling her his partner in life is very unusual.  It was very touching and special given the year.

After John’s death, Penina lived alone for several years before a daughter helped her out.   She died in 1892 at age 96, but had lived long enough  to see the birth of her great-great-great granddaughter.

 

Six Generations of Peelle Women. Left to right: Penina (Pate) Peelle, Harriett (Peelle) Keever, Elizabeth A. Rinard, Rebecca J. J. Lontz, Luella M. Gray, and Goldie V. Gray. October 21, 1890.